Video of Drake kissing 17-year-old girl on stage surfaces
Drake is under fire as a video making the rounds on social media purportedly shows him kissing a girl during one of his performances after she told him she was 17 years old.
In the video, which was tweeted out early Thursday morning, the “In My Feelings” rapper is seen dancing and flirting with a fan on stage.
“I told you I like your hair, right? What is this, like Herbal Essence?” the 32-year-old said before kissing her neck and wrapping his arms around her from behind.
“Ya’ll know I get carried away, I get in trouble for s–t,” he tells the crowd in the video posted by Twitter user @thespookgod and eventually unearthed by the Daily Beast.
He is then heard asking the young fan, “How old are you?” and she replied that she was 17.
When the crowd erupted, a shocked Drake said, “I can’t go to jail yet! Why you gotta look like that? [You’re] thick.”
It is not clear when or where the video was shot.
Since the footage was posted the same night the “Surviving R. Kelly” documentary aired, many Twitter users were quick to make a correlation to Drake’s relationship with 18-year-old model Bella Harris and friendship with 14-year-old actress Millie Bobby Brown.
The video concludes with the rapper saying he didn’t know “if I should feel guilty or not, but I had fun. I like the way your breasts feel against my chest,” he continued, adding, “I just want to thank you.”
He then proceeds to kiss the girl on both of her cheeks, her forehead and then on her lips.
A rep for the rapper didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Toni Braxton and Birdman look like they are over
It may be just another sad love song for Toni Braxton and Birdman.There’s speculation the singer and the hip hop impresario have split following their engagement in February.On Tuesday Birdman posted, and then deleted, an Instastory which said simply “It’s over.”
He then scrubbed his Instagram account of all the pictures.Likewise, Braxton also deleted all of her Instagram photos and posted a single one of her in a red dress.
Starting a new chapter isn’t always an easy choice…but ALWAYS choose to be chosen,” the caption read. “Cheers to a new year.” The pair are also not following each other on Instagram.Braxton and the Cash Money Records co-founder have reportedly been friends for years, but first went public with their romantic relationship in 2016 with an appearance at the BET Awards.They kept things pretty much under wraps, but the singer shared the engagement news in February, in a tweeted teaser for the sixth season of her family’s WE realty series, “Braxton Family Values.”Toni Braxton: ‘I’m engaged’Birdman made appearances on the show and Braxton could be seen wearing her reportedly $5 million engagement ring.In November it was reported that Braxton lost the ring after she left her luggage on a flight from New York to Los Angeles. Braxton was married to musician Keri Lewis from 2001 to 2013, and the pair are parents of two boys. CNN has reached out to reps for Braxton and Birdman for comment.
via: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/02/entertainment/toni-braxton-birdman-split/index.html
Janet Jackson is accused of removing a monument to her brother Michael from his childhood home for a video shoot and replacing it with a white board
- The stone tribute was erected outside Jackson’s childhood home after his death
- It disappeared last October and police said at the time that the family had it
- But a year later the huge monument has been replaced by a white board
A giant Michael Jackson monument which was mysteriously taken from his childhood home has been replaced with a white board.
Neighbours in Gary, Indiana, accused his sister Janet of removing the impressive plaque, although the family later claimed that it had been taken down temporarily and would be put back soon.
But a year on and there’s no sign of the huge plaque but instead a paper message board has appeared in its place, hanging on the railings.
The monument disappeared at the end of October last year and eagle-eyed locals said it was the same time as Janet came into town for her US tour – she was playing in nearby Chicago and visited the home the next day.
Gary Police Lt. Thomas Pawlak said at the time: ‘I guess it was taken down to do a video shoot. They are planning to do some landscaping in the spring. Once they are done, they’ll bring it back.’
Now tourists are complaining about the missing plaque and accusing the family of theft. Claudia T on TripAdvisor wrote: ‘Sad that the plaque was removed from front yard by family. They should put it back!!’
Another, called Dialjo, was furious that the family had taken the most impressive thing about the house, saying: ‘There is really nothing to see but a gated house. There are a few plaques and a place to leave a message on a white-board. Bring your own marker – the one their (sic) is dry.’
The stone was a mammoth epitaph to the King of Pop and paid its respects to the singer on one side, engraved with the words ‘Never Can Say Good Bye’.
The other side was adorned with pictures of Michael through the ages and a biography.
Now the only sign that the house ever belonged to the Jacksons is a plaque in the pathway which says ‘In Loving Memory of Michael J Jackson – You Gave Us A Lifetime of Love’ from all the Jackson family.
The other side was adorned with pictures of Michael through the ages and a biography.
Now the only sign that the house ever belonged to the Jacksons is a plaque in the pathway which says ‘In Loving Memory of Michael J Jackson – You Gave Us A Lifetime of Love’ from all the Jackson family.
The nine Jackson brothers and sisters, plus mum Katherine and dad Joe, lived at 2300 Jackson Street, all crammed into the two-bed house. Michael lived there until he was five years old.
One neighbor posted at the time of it going missing: ‘Just recently I noticed that the MJ memorial in the front yard has been removed.
‘To my knowledge, there has been no mention of where it went. It actually coincided with Janet’s time in the area performing in Chicago. I’m sure she might be able to shed some light on this. I’d be more than open to hear from her.’
Article via DailyMailUK
The “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” Discourse Is Boring as Hell
We’ve had the same argument for the last decade. Let’s… not.
On December 3, I got a press release about an artist who’d released a new album of both secular and religious Christmas songs. Instead of flaunting the songs she included, the entire email was about what wasn’t there. “Although she sympathizes with the movement, [the artist] is hardly a MeToo activist,” it read. “And she definitely wanted to include a romantic, even ‘sexy’ song among the 14 in her album. ’Baby It’s Cold’ was a default choice, but the more she studied the lyrics the more she was led to say ‘there’s no way I’m going to sing that song.’”
Good for her! It’s an overplayed (thanks, Elf) song that actually never mentions Christmas so it’s weird to put it on a Christmas album. But oh my god, I am so bored of the “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” discourse. Play it or don’t. It’s not a grand political position!
Let’s take a look at how we got to a time in which people will jump into your DMs about a song that you mainly hear piped in the background of department stores. The song was written in 1944 by Frank Loesser, whose songs you may have enjoyed in Guys and Dolls. He originally performed it as a flirtatious duet with his wife, Lynn Garland, at parties as an indication the night was over. “We become instant parlor room stars. We got invited to all the best parties for years on the basis of ‘Baby.’ It was our ticket to caviar and truffles. Parties were built around our being the closing act,” wrote Garland. But, in 1948, Loesser sold the song to MGM, and it won an Oscar for Best Song in 1949 after it was featured in the film Neptune’s Daughter.
The song was always about pursuit. In the original sheet music, Loesser labeled the two parts as “wolf” and “mouse,” setting up a predatory dynamic. But John Loesser, Frank Loesser’s son, told Vanity Fair that “it was a flirtatious, wonderful, sexy number between people who like each other. It really wasn’t anything but that.” It’s two people sizing each other up, doing a bit of verbal sparring, in that way that a lot of flirtation is. In most recordings, you can hear the smile in the “Mouse’s” voice. It doesn’t sound like entrapment.
But the artist is dead. In the 70 years since the song was written, more and more people have pointed out the Wolf blows past any idea of “no means no,” and that there’s a very thin line between consenting to a bit of a playful chase and pressuring someone to drink and not leave your house. In the past few years, it seems every December begins with at least one “remember, ‘Baby It’s Cold Outside’ is about date rape” take. A number of radio stations have banned the song this season, though some have faced blowback from the decision.
The problem is, both sides can find support for their arguments in the song. Those who defend it can point to lines like “I ought to say no, no, no sir / At least I’m gonna say that I tried” as proof that what she’s really worried about is the social stigma (much stronger in 1944) of staying late at a man’s house, and that were it not for nosy neighbors and family, she wouldn’t be trying to leave at all. Some even say it’s a feminist condemnation of gender expectations! But those who want it thrown out can point to the Mouse asking “Hey, what’s in this drink?” and “You’re very pushy you know?,” to which the Wolf responds “I like to think of it as opportunistic.” It’s easy to read that as creepy and predatory.
I’m all for erring on the side of making sure more people feel supported and included than not, and if the song is triggering and traumatizing then by all means, let’s not play it. But there’s a thirst with which people are ready to remind you that it’s a Bad Song, in the moral sense, as if that’s both the only reading and the only lens through which art is consumed. And as if morality is at all standardized. Perhaps it’s the cyclical nature of Christmas songs (though again, the song never actually mentions Christmas, or any holiday, only that it happens to be cold, and even that could be all in jest). “Blurred Lines” and “Animals” had their rotations, but “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” comes back every year, inspiring the same arguments that never get resolved.
They’ll never be resolved, because that’s not how art works. Songs can be read multiple ways. People can calculate aesthetics and personal morality and draw different conclusions. I hear the song a different way each time I hear it. Sometimes it makes me feel playful and warm, other times I reel at the Wolf’s lyrics. In many ways I’m glad to have been asked to think twice about it, in the same way I find myself analyzing the stalker dynamics of rom-coms I took at face value as a teenager. But what you think about “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” represents just that—not that you’re more woke or more reasonable than those who disagree with you, not that you’ve aligned yourself with larger political strands. Just that you heard the song and, for all the reasons we are either drawn to or repulsed by art, landed somewhere.
Opinion Ed via GQ.com
Elfen’s Neo-Soul New Music Tuesday James Vickery Until Morning EP
There’s one thing I’ve learned If you want to hear good music in any genre you have to look for it. And this week I have been listening to to a dude who lives all the way in south Lundon named James Vickery. His new album Until Morning (EP) Estended Play has clear smooth romantic lyrics. James can sang! The musical composition is fresh. Track 3 Tonight could easily be a U.S club banner if given a chance. Hell this album would even be Grammy nominated for best album of the year. #clickplay and TRUN IT UP Neo-soul fo’ LIFE!! See you next week for more Neo-Soul goodness!
Will R. Kelly be banned from entering Australia?
Future of controversial R&B star’s tour Down Under looks uncertain after ’90s battery conviction and allegations of sexual misconduct
Controversial American R&B star R. Kelly announced this week he will tour Australia and New Zealand in February 2019.
The 51-year-old Ignition singer will perform his first show in Brisbane on Friday, February 8.
However, the announcement has led to speculation the scandal-plagued star may be banned from entering Australia due to its strict visa regulations, after he was convicted of battery in the ’90s and also faced allegations of sexual misconduct.
‘Mr Kelly was cleared of all allegations and in our view, you are innocent until proven guilty.’
It comes after the likes of Chris Brown and Snoop Dogg (real name Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr.) were banned from entering Australia due to their past convictions.
In 2015, Chris had to cancel his tours of Australia and New Zealand due to being denied a visa over his history of domestic violence.
In 2007, Snoop Dogg was banned due to drug and firearm offences.
It was previously reported by Billboard that R. Kelly was charged with simple battery and sentenced to one year unsupervised probation after a brawl at a health club in Lafayette, Louisiana in 1996.
Meanwhile, just last week R. Kelly made headlines when a New York screening of an upcoming documentary detailing abuse allegations against him was evacuated.
Phone threats were made to the Manhattan location where it was being held.
The documentary examines the singer’s history, and in particular allegations that he has sexually abused women and girls. He has denied any wrongdoing.
In May this year, it was reported that a former teenage girlfriend of R. Kelly – who is suing him for allegedly giving her herpes – claimed he also videotaped himself having non-consensual sex with her.
Faith Rodgers was 19 years old when she started dating R. Kelly, whom she met at a party after his concert in San Antonio, Texas. She claims that the relationship quickly became abusive.
She spoke to CBS News about her relationship with R. Kelly, saying she filed the lawsuit against him in New York for ‘willfully, deliberately and maliciously’ infecting her with herpes to warn other teenage girls who may come into contact with him.
Rodgers added that she believes Kelly was trying to bring her into a group of women that he lives with. Kelly has been accused of running a ‘sex cult’ with several women at his disposal.
The sexual abuse lawsuit filed by Rodgers is the latest in a string of accusations that the musician – whose real name is Robert Sylvester Kelly – made women have sex with him.
The singer, however, recently said he has been left ‘heartbroken’ by the allegations, and has criticised the media for trying to distort and destroy his legacy by reporting allegations that he sexually mistreats women.
He was acquitted of child pornography charges in Chicago in 2008, The Guardian reported – but speculation about his alleged sexual misconduct has continued.
In October, R. Kelly’s ex-wife Andrea Kelly broke down during a TV interview while discussing their marriage, saying she suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) because of an alleged assault by her then-husband.
‘I remember one time he attacked me in the back of a Hummer, and I do suffer from PTSD because of it,’ Andrea, who was married to the star for 13 years, told The View.
‘I thought I was going to die in the back of the Hummer because of what he had done.’
Andrea Kelly also spoke to The Sister Circle in June about the marriage, saying how it drove her to almost commit suicide and how she feels sorry for the young women who R. Kelly is now accused of keeping as ‘sex slaves’.
The former couple divorced in 2009. It was R. Kelly’s second marriage as he reportedly previously wed late singer Aaliyah when she was aged 15 and he was 27.
Article via DailyMail